well, maybe less. i really think that post was typed in, and not a copy from the command line. in fact, i'll try it now. there's no reason at all to type in /bin/tcsh - assuming that tcsh is the default (which it is) and hasn't been changed. even still, no point in running man/Man from there... hmm, well, it seems that my shell accepts both "Man," and "man." I use bash. I think this is bad. but i understand the compromise apple made in supporting HFS. perhaps that's the real argument here - when can they dump HFS(+). --alan actual terminal copy: Last login: Sun Dec 15 11:10:59 on ttyp1 Cool! Refreshing! Tictac! bash-2.05a$ bash-2.05a$ man woman No manual entry for woman bash-2.05a$ Man woman No manual entry for woman On Tuesday, December 17, 2002, at 02:10 PM, Arturo Pérez wrote: > nothing more nothing less.