[G4] Re: G4] Master vs Slave HDs & OSX

[John Baltutis]

On 10/01/04, Dennis Murphy <dennis at gem.e-catv.ne.jp> wrote:
>
> Great list. This is my first posting. I don't have a problem at the moment
> but I do have a question about my setup. I have a 400MHz Sawtooth with 960MB
> of RAM running OSX 10.2.8. The machine came with a 10GB HD and I added an
> 80GB second internal drive which is set as slave. Before installing the
> second drive and OSX the 10GB HD had OS9 installed (naturally). When I
> installed OSX I left Classic on the 10GB HD and installed OSX on the 80GB
> drive. My question is, does having the 80GB drive set as slave have any
> affect on performance? Would it make any difference if I changed the 10GB
> drive to slave and the 80GB drive to master?

Nope. However, I'd swap the two, making the new HD the master and the other
the slave.