[G4] SCSI Help, please
Rick Smykla
rsmykla at verizon.net
Sat Dec 23 12:04:18 PST 2006
On Dec 18, 2006, at 12:32 PM, Ernest Vincent Pons-Worley wrote:
> I was able to use this scanner in the past on the G3 running Ubuntu
> Linux; therefore, I know that SANE (or was it XSANE?) and gimp
> work with it. Unfortunately I can't get Fink Commander to install
> either the SANE front or backend or gimp on the G4. The install
> aborts complaining about wrong dependencies (or something like that).
Ernest,
Very much a kludge, but see my quoted email below for a solution that
allowed me to use an older UMAX scanner with the SANE software. Maybe
there's some info here that will help you with your SCSI scanner . . .
HTH,
Rick
> From: rsmykla
> Subject: [Umax1220u-sane-devel] UMAX 1600U working (somewhat)
> Date: September 24, 2004 4:28:36 PM EDT
> To: umax1220u-sane-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
>
> Just thought I'd drop a note to share my success with using the
> currently available drivers (available from <http://www.ellert.se/
> twain-sane/> with the UMAX 1600U and OS X 10.3.5. This may not be
> news here, but I thought I'd post anyway, in case someone has
> struggled with this scanner before, and more-or-less given up, as I
> had previously.
> Good news is that my UMAX 1600U scanner is working with the
> frontend, even though it is identified by the frontend as a model
> 2000U, and by scanimage as a 1220U!
>
> TWAIN SANE Interface v0.8
>
> SANE backends 1.0.14-cvs 2004-06-20
>
> libusb 0.1.8 (patched)
>
> gettext 0.11.5
>
> Resolution is (apparently) currently limited to 150 DPI, but I'm
> able to get good scans using the TWAIN SANE Interface through both
> Photoshop and GraphicConverter, as well as using the frontend
> application available here: <http://www.motoriweb.com/sanefrontend/
> > Download the beta version SANE scanner frontend 1.2b
>
> The 1600U is working with the frontend, even though it is
> identified by the frontend as a model 2000U, and by scanimage as a
> 1220U.
>
> First time I've been able to do X-native scanning with this setup.
> If you've got one of these collecting dust, or were using Classic
> to do your scans, this is a workable alternative. FYI.
>
More information about the G4
mailing list