On Dec 18, 2006, at 12:32 PM, Ernest Vincent Pons-Worley wrote: > I was able to use this scanner in the past on the G3 running Ubuntu > Linux; therefore, I know that SANE (or was it XSANE?) and gimp > work with it. Unfortunately I can't get Fink Commander to install > either the SANE front or backend or gimp on the G4. The install > aborts complaining about wrong dependencies (or something like that). Ernest, Very much a kludge, but see my quoted email below for a solution that allowed me to use an older UMAX scanner with the SANE software. Maybe there's some info here that will help you with your SCSI scanner . . . HTH, Rick > From: rsmykla > Subject: [Umax1220u-sane-devel] UMAX 1600U working (somewhat) > Date: September 24, 2004 4:28:36 PM EDT > To: umax1220u-sane-devel at lists.sourceforge.net > > Just thought I'd drop a note to share my success with using the > currently available drivers (available from <http://www.ellert.se/ > twain-sane/> with the UMAX 1600U and OS X 10.3.5. This may not be > news here, but I thought I'd post anyway, in case someone has > struggled with this scanner before, and more-or-less given up, as I > had previously. > Good news is that my UMAX 1600U scanner is working with the > frontend, even though it is identified by the frontend as a model > 2000U, and by scanimage as a 1220U! > > TWAIN SANE Interface v0.8 > > SANE backends 1.0.14-cvs 2004-06-20 > > libusb 0.1.8 (patched) > > gettext 0.11.5 > > Resolution is (apparently) currently limited to 150 DPI, but I'm > able to get good scans using the TWAIN SANE Interface through both > Photoshop and GraphicConverter, as well as using the frontend > application available here: <http://www.motoriweb.com/sanefrontend/ > > Download the beta version SANE scanner frontend 1.2b > > The 1600U is working with the frontend, even though it is > identified by the frontend as a model 2000U, and by scanimage as a > 1220U. > > First time I've been able to do X-native scanning with this setup. > If you've got one of these collecting dust, or were using Classic > to do your scans, this is a workable alternative. FYI. >