<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Richard Klein wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid69ce86c30708131415j5c06a4a7w41e17d32fcb6b982@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On 8/13/07, <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Technophobic_Tom@comcast.net">Technophobic_Tom@comcast.net</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Technophobic_Tom@comcast.net"><Technophobic_Tom@comcast.net></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On 13 Aug 2007 at 09:25:24 -0700 Harry Freeman wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Aug 13, 2007, at 9:20 AM, <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Technophobic_Tom@comcast.net">Technophobic_Tom@comcast.net</a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">System Profiler reports PC2600U-30330 but I find very scarce
information on that DIMM. If I add a pair of 512 PC2700's, how much
will their speed be downgraded by the presences of the PC2600's?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Your platform will only run as fast as your slowest memory modules.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Yeah...I knew the qualitative answer as implied in the question.
I'm still looking for the **QUANTITATIVE** answer..."HOW much?"
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Are you sure you don't mean qualitative? Quantitatively speaking,
it'll address all the memory at the lowest common denominator: 2.6GB/s
instead of 2.667GB/s. Qualitatively, I don't think you'll notice the
difference, but my Quicksilver only uses 133MHz SDR memory, anyway.
</pre>
</blockquote>
I wouldn't fret. Mine says PC-2600 also and I took the dimm out and it
is labeled PC-2700. It is by a good manufacturer Micron. I wouldn't
worry about it. I bet it is just and idiosyncrasy.<br>
<br>
Mike<br>
</body>
</html>