>On Tuesday, April 1, 2003, at 09:08 PM, Erica Sadun wrote: > >>At 9:01 PM -0500 4/1/03, Jim Asherman wrote: >>>On Tuesday, April 1, 2003, at 08:15 PM, Erica Sadun wrote: >>> >>>>>720x480 I believe. >>>> >>>>Square pixels >>>>720 x 480 NTSC >>>>720 x 576 PAL >>>> >>>>Rectangular pixels >>>>640 x 480 >>>>768 x 576 >>>> >>>>TV Safe -5% overall >>>>Title Safe -10% overall >>>> >>>>FYI, -- Erica >>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>>Cheez and crackers Erica I sure don't wanna get in this with you >>>but that doesn't sound right. I mean right off NTSC is >>>rectangular not square right? >>>and Computers are square which is why the 640 goes to 720 when you >>>rectangularize it. Right? That's why they tell you to work taller >>>than 480 and then >>>squish it top to bottom right? >>>This has been an issue many times especially when I had the >>>Toaster which is rectangular native, and I know i have a twisted >>>perspective. (LOL) >> >>Rectangular pixels are wider, not taller. >> >>-- Erica >> > >Yes I know. >jim Okay. Blonde moment here: What exactly are you asking? -- Erica, feeling platinum