>OK, now I've seen this comment from several posters. > >But I don't get it. > >This post is not directly specifically at Daniel, but at all who >have posted similar sentiments. > >How would less information from Kunga be helpful to the list? > >How does his volume of posts keep others from posting? The list >doesn't limit the number of messages per day, AFAIK. > >What kind of "balance" are you looking for? Balance between what and >what else? > >I'm glad that he is willing to share his information with us. I >don't always agree with his opinions, but I don't feel intimidated >by views I don't agree with. I don't want him to hold back on >responding to a question on the list because he had posted a lot >recently. It might be a question from me. :-) > What He Said. If someone doesn't want to read Kunga's posts for some reason then they can just set up a filter in their email client (and if they don't know how to set up a filter then they can just ask Kunga - I'm sure he'd be happy to tell them how ;-)). Now can we get back to worrying about some Serious Issues (tm), like the Michael Jackson documentary last night ? Paul --