[MacDV] : S-VCD a bit more OT

[Kunga]

It's about cheap limited distribution Joe. CDs cost 1¢ each while DVDs 
cost 80¢ each. If you have a small target that has DVD-Players that are 
S-VCD compatible, this is a cheap way to go.

k

On Sunday, June 8, 2003, at 09:33  PM, Joe Camporesi wrote:

> MY gut feeling on this because of mer size difference between a DVD 
> and a
> CD, if your doing anything that is 20 minutes or longer and you want 
> the
> least amount of compression is why go s-vcd verse dvd unless you don't 
> have
> a DVD burner?  If I had no DVD burner (and I am no pro in the art of 
> buring
> DVD or compression for that matter) is edit your project and go back 
> to mini
> DV and use that as a player.
>
> Joe Camporesi
>
>
> On 6/8/03 3:40 PM, "Kunga" <Kunga at FutureMedia.org> wrote:
>
>> SVCD not VCD Joe. SVCD is similar resolution to that of DVD. VCD is
>> more like VHS resolution.

Kunga

<http://www.ipod-zone.com>
<http://www.cube-zone.com>
<http://www.apple-zone.com>
<http://www.osx-zone.com>