Could you elaborate on what kind of quality improvements it makes? Thanks Shirley On Mar 15, 2006, at 5:45 AM, JScal00 at aol.com wrote: > > I agree wholeheartedly. I have a Canopus 300 which converts both ways > and enhances poor quality recordings as well! It's worth the extra > money if you're going to make us if its benefits. > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/enriched Size: 514 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/pipermail/macdv/attachments/20060315/a7f2b7f5/attachment.bin