[Ti] mandatory booting into os x
Michael Bigley
wakinyan at fuse.net
Wed Dec 11 23:30:43 PST 2002
>I'm still curious for any kind of fact-based answer to the
>question. Ie, not a reasoned dismissal of the question.
>Eg, did that purchase, described at the time as evidence of
>an understanding for cooperation, result in any M$ish
>decision-makers being placed?
The number was $150 million, IIRC. And it was part of an agreement
for Apple to drop the patent infringement suit against Microsoft for
the Windows OS, not an investment. That was the minor part of the
agreement; even in the darkest days of Apple, which was that time,
they still had $4 BILLION in cash on hand. So the money was more
symbolic than significant.
The significant part of that agreement was that MS continue to
produce in relative parity with Windows, the Office Suite and
Internet Explorer. It was about Bill Gates coming out publicly
saying "We support the Mac OS in software development." at a time
when developers and hardware vendors were abandoning Mac like rats on
a sinking ship. BTW, that agreement ended this year, but MS now has
the Mac Business Unit, which is turning a tidy profit for the
company, so despite the rumors, I doubt MS will abandon Mac in the
near future.
With Jobs coming back to the helm, he needed to stop the developer
abandonment, or at least slow it, and that agreement was a huge band
aid. Microsoft got a "safe" competitor to wag in front of the DOJ
antitrust investigators.
Jobs brought a lot of the "old" Apple philosophy back; that is,
listening to their customers. He also brought a new commitment and
relationship to developers. It has only been in recent months that
they seem to have let that slip.
--
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
Mike Bigley Maineville, Ohio
http://www.norbertrunning.com
Please support an American Indian Elder &
Medicine Man by visiting the above link.
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
More information about the Titanium
mailing list