Don;t know exactly, will ask, but to support your perception my brother (on XP) moved to an AMD board (probably the same as yours: this 1200 number rings a bell) and he says it has been a quantum leap forward wrt to the old Intel chip (a ~1GHz) The con with PCs (although PC users in general say it is a pro) is that you cannot count on *a* configuration which will work and perfectly tuned with your OS. On paper same specs may gibe their users totally different experiences. I agree with you that a crap PC is by far more easier to be trapped into than a crap Mac: a Mac is a Mac is a Mac. Like it or not you know exactly what you get: no bad surprises. Looks like your PC is giving you a taste of a Mac experience ;-) On Sunday, December 15, 2002, at 08:01 PM, PowerBook G4 Titanium List wrote: > Message-ID: <3DFCB439.7030107 at borgepalace.com> > Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 17:56:25 +0100 > From: Daniel Borge <dani at borgepalace.com> > Subject: [Ti] x86 vs ppc > > Hi guys, Not to be nitpicking here, but there are big differences btw > winXP pc's too... Mine AMD 1200 have no problem to rip a CD and listen > to it at the same time (using RealPlayer One which is a great & nice > looking program too... hehe) and there are absoultely no "hangs" when I > browse on the net, download doozen files from Kazaa and watch a divx > film at the same time... Wounder what crap pc's u'r friends have :) > since my 1 & 1/2 year old pc can do all this. Daniel > > -- Massimo Marino NERSC Division - HPC Department Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~marino On leave at CERN, CH, EP Division, Atlas experiment phone: (+41) 22 767-1288 fax: (+41) 22 767-8350 Office: 40-3-D16 alternate email: marino at slac.stanford.edu, marino at mail.cern.ch, Massimo.Marino at cern.ch