[Ti] [OT] Applemusic.com - is the price right?
Steve Talkowski
stevetalkowski at mac.com
Tue Apr 29 10:47:19 PDT 2003
On Tuesday, April 29, 2003, at 01:15 PM, Shawn King wrote:
> On 4/28/03 3:36 PM, "Sam Hotchkiss" <ti at zlit.net> wrote:
>
>> On 4/28/03 2:29 PM, "Trevor J. Hutley" <hutley at geneva-link.ch> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> How do others see the price aspect of this innovation?
>>
>> I agree with you 100%... Apple needs to either price individual tracks
>> SIGNIFICANTLY cheaper or provide it in blocks: $20/month gets you 100
>> songs.
>> As there are no (significant) costs relating to actual production
>> once the
>> artist is finished with it, apple has no reason to charge $1 a track
>> and
>> they know it.
>
> Apple has one huge reason - that's the price people are willing to pay.
Which "people" are you referring to Shawn? Do you have any evidence
supporting this claim?
> Why price it at $0.50 when people are willing to pay $0.99 and leave
> $0.49
> on the table?
LOL - listen to yourself - who exactly was polled and asked how much
they were willing to pay?
Personally, I have no problem plunking down a buck or two for a few
good songs off of a dud of an album.
More information about the Titanium
mailing list