At 07:34 AM -0800 11/02/03, Steve Wozniak wrote: >At 6:27 AM -0800 11/2/03, Robert Ameeti wrote: > >> >http://www.macobserver.com/editorial/2003/10/28.1.shtml >> >>My only comments on the above article was that it was wrong on many >>aspects of the Panther environment. The writer was looking for an >>article to write regardless of his intimacy of knowledge of the >>subject at hand. > >That article is predicated on the article about the spacial finder, >the second URL that Justin presented. In order to comment you should >read this one first, in lengthy detail. It really explains why the >Finder, from day one, was so good and what higher level thoughts led >to it. > >Now not all of us may be strangely spacially oriented. I myself am >so. I want things in my own standard locations with their own >appearance. This is like the efficient secretary that can be brought >to a stop if the janitor rearranges things in her desk. It's the >'difference' that the Macintosh was about from the start. It's >certainly the preferred mode of operation for 'the rest of us'. Some >experts work fine with column mode exclusively, or even command >lines, and for them the spacial finder is of lesser importance. But >even in that case, a lot of us don't let others rearrange our >windows for us. > ><http://www.arstechnica.com/paedia/f/finder/finder-1.html> >-- Exactly, I am more spatially oriented. But there are some things that do bug me about the new Finder, but, I though the 'browser' style has been there for a while, it just isn't too consistent , read this article, and not the one above linked by Woz: http://www.arstechnica.com/reviews/003/panther/macosx-10.3-1.html. I've also noted that the 'zoom' widget no longer works-it seems to go to an arbitrary size and not just right like in previous systems. Maybe it has to do with views, but, It's rather annoying-Apple should only borrow the good ideas from Windows. erik g