Well, somebody else already mentioned this, but I'll go a little more in-depth; yes, 1152x768 is a hardware limit. There are exactly that number of pixels on an LCD display, no more, no less. Lower resolutions are made by scaling each pixel to be a little bit larger than it actually is, and then putting it on the screen. The lower performance is due to the fact that the computer is *still* pushing out 1152x768 pixels, but before it draws those, it has to figure out how to scale up from a lower resolution, giving the video card more work. So no, you can't make your display bigger than it actually is; besides, if you did that, instead of using some data multiple times to fill more pixels, you'd be actually *losing* data. Also, things would be fuzzy like they are at lower-than-optimal resolutions. So you'd have a fuzzy display with even smaller text, and many details would be lost in the display. You'd be much, much better off to just buy yourself a nice external display instead of wasting your time on the impossible. Loren Schooley <loren at flash.net> writes: > Comparing numbers on a 550mhz Ti, it would seem that running 256 > colors/800x600 would require less power, and offer more performance > than > running the graphics at maximum capability. Not so according to > benchmarks, > when running at the max 1152x768/millions, the performance actually > increases at many levels. That said, I see no harm in hacking the video > driver to pull a 1280x1024 resolution. > > I have just started to find out how I can do this, and X11 should have > a > configuration file where I can begin. Question is, has anyone > attempted this > already? I can't find anything on the web.