On Thursday, October 16, 2003, at 09:56 PM, Henry Kalir wrote: > Sorry Neil - my post was somewhat ambiguous. I meant to say that OTHER > (Photoshop etc) dual-platform apps come out with upgrades and > improvements > for their Windows-based apps first. I was not referring to the Apple > programmed apps. Wouldn't that make sense - considering companies that put out dual-platform apps sell many times more copies to Windows users than Mac users? I don't see the logic in pointing out what simply makes economic sense for a 3rd party developer then trying to jump to the conclusion that Apple will do the same thing. But you know what? Considering the fact that the iTMS will almost certainly make MUCH more money off Windows users than Mac users - I wouldn't hold it against Apple if it did give iTunes for Windows at least equal priority as the Mac version. Apple's in this to make money, after all - and we ought to encourage them to do so.