[Ti] XBench 800 MHZ DVI compared with 1.6 GHZ 64MB VRAM
Bill Fox
wfoxjr at earthlink.net
Thu Feb 3 22:16:33 PST 2005
Oops, I think Paul hit it right. My 1.5 GHz 17" PBG4 Xbench numbers
were based on "Automatic" here are the "Highest" numbers--huge
difference:
Results 143.28
System Info
Xbench Version 1.1.3
System Version 10.3.7 (7S215)
Physical RAM 1024 MB
Model PowerBook5,5
Processor PowerPC G4 @ 1.50 GHz
L1 Cache 32K (instruction), 32K (data)
L2 Cache 512K @ 1.50 GHz
Bus Frequency 167 MHz
Video Card ATY,RV360M11
Drive Type TOSHIBA MK8025GAS
CPU Test 165.56
Thread Test 127.50
Memory Test 130.02
Quartz Graphics Test 178.61
OpenGL Graphics Test 112.65
User Interface Test 211.36
Disk Test 55.08
On Feb 3, 2005, at 9:45 PM, Paul H. Yoshimune wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 11:27:47PM -0600, Robert Nicholson wrote:
>> It wasn't by any means a scientific test but perhaps there are issues
>> with XBench on the newer powerbooks?
>>
>> I definately shut down all apps before conducting the test though.
>
> You might check in the Energy Saver preference, and see if there's a
> processor
> performance setting. Make sure it's set to "highest"; having it other
> settings
> has been shown to greatly affect performance...
More information about the Titanium
mailing list