Henry Kalir wrote: > Guys, > > NO change ever occurs without someone being unhappy or complaining, > and I mean change ANYWHERE in any field - computers, medicine, > automotive - you name it - the list is INFINITE. > > The reason is simple - we all want change as users (for the better), > but as service/product providers we want to stick to a system that > works for us and not be bothered with having to rewrite/relearn...or > just change something. > > BUT - the 970 has reached a plateau, and it is NOT what makes the Mac > great AND it's TIME TO MOVE ON! > > New processors are constantly being developed and, just as we're none > the worse for having moved into the mainstream with regards to the HD > (remember those SCSIs? Missing the 4x price, anyone?) or the RAM > chips, we'll do very well now with ANY processor that's thrown our > way. Intel is better in my mind than IBM, and certainly a willing > partner (as Woz has put it). > > Lot's of work and a BIG pain ahead for all you developers out there? > SURE!! Bitching and carping and teeth-gnashing? You BET. Some will > "drop out"? Maybe. But in the end many more will come we'll have a > solid, thriving Mac, for the WHOLE is (much) bigger than the SUM of > its parts. > > Best, > > Henry > > Not a software/hardware engineer, nor do I play one on TV. > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/pipermail/titanium/attachments/20050607/232f0232/attachment.html