> And this is borne out by my own experience as well. I have both a dual > 1.42 PowerMac and a PowerMac G5/2.5. On anything that doesn't take > advantage of the G5's floating point power, the dual G4, running at > much lower clock speed, either very favorably compares or on some tasks > beats the dual G5. > > I'll take a dual core G4 PowerBook any day before I'd be interested in > a G5. The G5 is a floating point monster, but it's not the all-around > general processing powerhouse that the marketing hype has made it out > to be. > -- > Chris Chris we have the same thing here, you better check that G5. Do not know about Photoshop, I work in Audio and Video. The G5 using plug-ins, encoding or rendering is twice as fast (seems like) as our dual G4. Brian