> Why didn't they make it a bluetooth remote or a Airport remote? > What else is infrared good for? > > On 13-Oct-05, at 4:54 PM, John Pariseau wrote: > >> It'd be pretty funny - our aged and venerable Ti PB's being >> compatible with a brand new Apple accessory, while the PB's in >> between (am I correct that AlBooks don't have IR?) are >> incompatible with the remote. I'm making a prediction that Apple >> computers from now on will have built in IR on the front. Just a >> guess. Bluetooth: power hungry ideally suited for two way communication overbuilt for this type of application pairing issues Airport (ie, 802.11b): Same as above, plus totally overkill an IP somehow would have to be assigned, how? DHCP? Manually?