On Sep 1, 2005, at 11:10 AM, Chris Olson wrote: > I suspect as it gets right down to the wire reality is going to set > in, and you're going to see more major application vendors simply drop > out of the scene because it makes no business sense to support two > different operating environments Wasn't this exactly what was said about the transition from OS 9 to OS X? Look, I don't pretend to have any inside information and I am certainly NOT a computer wiz- I'm just a user. For me, the Mac is a tool and, from my perspective, a good one. I prefer it to a Windows environment, that much is certain. Do I particularly LOVE the notion that the Mac will be switching to Intel processors? Not really. But by the same token, I don't really give a rat's derriere as long as the overall platform continues to outshine its Windows competitors from a users point of view. And I understand that you are concerned about that being the case. However, unless you truly believe that Steve, et al have decided to commit corporate suicide, it seems to me that it makes sense to let the process play out. Once it has, if you really think alternative platforms are superior, you will migrate in that direction. But the bulk of us good old general users don't care whether Intel, Motorola, IBM, or Frito Lays provides the chips as long as the overall system works in an "Apple" way. We won't know the answer to that till there are products out there actually running the new processors. Till then, while concern about the readiness of applications is appropriate, it strikes me that much of the angst and apprehension about this is somewhat overstated. Just my 4¢ worth (with the price of gasoline in this part of the US going for over $3/gal, 2¢ is no longer an option!) "When you come to the edge of all the light you know and are about to drop off into the darkness of the unknown, faith is knowing that one of two things will happen: There will be something solid to stand on or you will be taught how to fly." -- Anonymous