[X Newbies] Apple and all of these viruses?
Randy B. Singer
randy at macattorney.com
Sat Aug 23 16:50:50 PDT 2003
Steven Rogers said:
>>> Second - a widespread Mac virus would certainly attract big press.
>>
>> I don't disagree with your overall argument, but the above statement
>> has already proven to be false.
>>
>> Two years ago the Simpsons virus . . . was stopped quickly and it
>> was not widespread) nor did it garner "huge headlines." In fact, few
>> Mac users even know about the existence of this virus.
>
>Well, I said a widespread virus would attract headlines. You said that
>is false because a virus that was *not* widespread didn't garner
>headlines. I don't quite see the logic.
You said:
>...one good
>virus should be able to cripple a substantial portion of Mac users. And
>given the way the press likes to pounce on any Apple foible, that would
>certainly be huge headlines.
By all accounts, the Simpsons virus was a "good virus". Yet it still
wasn't able to "cripple a substantial portion of Mac users." And it
garnered practically no headlines at all.
Randy B. Singer
Co-Author of: The Macintosh Bible (4th, 5th and 6th editions)
How To Deal With Common Macintosh OS X Jaguar Problems
http://www.macattorney.com/tutorial.html
More information about the X-Newbies
mailing list