At 8:47 PM -0400 8/30/03, TheMacintoshLady wrote: >Both machines would have to be the kind that didn't need a crossover >cable, and those would be the newer ones. The article said if one WASN'T, >that the crossover cable WOULD be needed............... You are making incorrect assertions in lieu of the facts presented to you in previous posts. Unless countered, they stand in the archives and serve to mislead others who might actually believe that there was fact-based merit to your statement. The article itself <http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=42717> is fairly penetrable to most people taking the time to read and consider it as it applies to any two Apple products on the two lists therein. You obviously are not one of those so fortunate. You should instead equip yourself with a straight and a crossover cable, make some tests in your 16-computer home computing environment and then write a short and incisive piece which communicates your findings in a manner explanatory to others who find themselves misled by the Apple article. There is no such thing as one explanation that fits all. In testing and rendering an explanation, you would do a service to many who might otherwise suffer the same confusion that the Apple article induced for you. -- 'tis as said. [Reality is defined by being described]