leigh tapped out this message on 3/15/2003 1:32 AM >And which ones, specifically, would those be? Why don't you read the docs? >I'm curious about how FaxSTF's failure to be accepted as a worthy >replacement for a product like GlobalFax could possibly be due to >"limitations of the OS." There is no GlobalFax for X or I'd be using it. >And how that could possibly explain the fact that people didn't accept >the Mac OS 9 version of FaxSTF either. YOU may not have accepted it but plenty of folks that I work with use it just fine. Why should they buy something when a perfectly good application that works flawlessly for the occasional fax, came with the machine free? :-)