Steven Rogers <srogers1 at austin.rr.com> wrote: > On May 19, 2005, at 4:48 AM, Jamie Kahn Genet wrote: > > > Steven Rogers <srogers1 at austin.rr.com> wrote: > > > >> On May 18, 2005, at 4:21 AM, Jamie Kahn Genet wrote: > >> > >>> Steven Rogers <srogers1 at austin.rr.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> So what's the deal with Mail now doing replies as top-posting in > >>>> Tiger (i.e., the cursor is at the top) ?! > >>>> > >>>> I'd hoped that 10.4.1 was going to fix it, but no joy there. Is > >>>> there at least a setting that changes this? > >>> > >>> Just manually move the insertion point below quoted text. > >> > >> Well, thanks to my years of computing experience, I was able to work > >> that out. But I'm more concerned about the newbies who aren't really > >> aware of the difference. > > > > Sorry, but anyone silly enough not to solve this annoyance by clicking > > the mouse once... well, I'd better not go there ;-) > > Well, first of all, the whole point of software design is to prevent > that sort of thing. If there is a "right" place to put the cursor, > then the program should damn well put the cursor there, and if there > are two possible "right" places, then there should be a preference. > If there's some controversy, the WORST possible solution is to issue > version X of the program built around the idea that the bottom is the > right place, and then release version X+1 built around the idea that > the top is the right place. Whoever made that design choice should be > beaten with their own spec - and anyone who says the *USER* should > solve it, should be forced to use Windows forever. *grins* Surely you would not consign someone to so awful a fate? > Secondly, have you actually tried it??? Not only is the cursor stuck > at the bottom, there's some additional tag wrapped around the message > so that when you click at the bottom, and then hit the backspace key > to get rid of trailing junk, your cursor hops right over the message > and back to the top. You have to click back to the bottom *again* to > edit away trailing crud. So not only does this encourage the newbie > to top-post, it encourages those who do take the extra step to do it > "The Right Way" to still leave all the crap on the end of the message > (as the top-posters are wont to do). > > SR Good grief - Mail 2 really does that? Urrgh. I'm frankly amazed. No text editor (which includes Mail's editor for emails) should ever move the insertion point in such a manner (assuming I understand you correctly). I have only used Mail 1 myself. But I can certainly see how annoying that must be to you. All I can do is suggest moving to another email program. There are some very attractive alternatives, these days. Regards, Jamie Kahn Genet -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting aka TOFU (Top-post Over, Full quote Under) Q: What is the most annoying thing on mailing lists?