Vincent Cayenne <vcayenne at mac.com> wrote: > At 12:04 AM -0500 5/21/05, Steven Rogers wrote: > >>Quality is not the issue in the end. Remember video standards? Beta was > >>actually better than VHS, but the more important thing was that everyone > >>used the same standard, otherwise not all movies were available to everyone. > > > >This has been repeated until most people think its true, but it is > >just completely wrong. First, Beta was not "better" than VHS in any > >way that the user actually cares about, which is a critical point. > >To say that beta was actually better, but people just didn't > >understand why is to miss the whole point of what "better" is. > >Further, it was not important that everyone use the same standard. > >Sony wanted to charge more for Beta, which was identical to VHS to > >everyone but video geeks, and average consumers did not want to pay > >extra. > > Nah. It was about the porn and about length (now *there's* a pun > waiting to happen!) > > <http://www.answers.com/topic/betamax> > <http://www.law.indiana.edu/fclj/pubs/v49/no1/johnson.html> > <http://www.socialistreview.org.uk/article.php?articlenumber=9272> Yes, as usual - porn drives technology, and VHS allowed the dodgier studios to fit more porn on the tapes ;-) Regards, Jamie Kahn Genet -- If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.