On Jun 4, 2007, at 7:02 PM, Charles Martin wrote: >>>> cause problems if you move them out of the Applications folder? >>> >>> FAR too many to list here. >> >> Please list a few good examples. > > I'll list one that I can recall specifically: Quark Xpress. Remove > the app from where the installer put it, and it fails to function. > Try it yourself. > > Unless you're offering to pay me to test other apps for you, I > would suggest that if YOU are the one who wants a list, YOU can > spend the time testing apps. > > I'm not going to go through my application folder and test each app > to find out which ones stop working FOR you. You listed _one_ application that won't run outside the Applications folder. That doesn't make it a rule. I would dare to guess that just about everyone on this list has applications in places other than the Applications folder. At the root level of their drive, in a special folder where they like to keep them, etc. I'm sure that every one of these folks can tell you that all of these applications run just fine. Even application developers often tell users to install their product "in the Applications folder, or anywhere that you want." I note that there is no Apple tech note, no Ars Technica, article, no empirical evidence gathered by MacFixIt, *nothing* saying that you have to keep all applications in the Applications folder. Because you don't. Just about every Mac user knows this from experience. It's true that its easiest (from a logical organizational standpoint), and sometimes even best, and very rarely necessary, to keep applications in the Applications folder, but its not a hard and fast rule. And in the vast majority of instances, locating an application outside of the Applications folder won't hurt anything. > >> And I would still love to hear how doing so will "Play havoc with the >> directory." > > I would have thought this one was rather obvious, but I'll explain > in more detail. > > NORMAL USE causes directory corruption. > > Thus, ANYTHING that makes the computer work harder than it needs to > leads to an increased risk of directory corruption. I can buy the argument that it is perfectly normal for the directory to become corrupted over time. However I can't think of a single reason why locating an application outside of the Applications folder, or a file outside of the Documents folder, makes the "computer work harder" or why it would lead to accelerated or abnormal directory corruption. The computer has to keep track of everything on it no matter where you put things. It doesn't have conniptions and do cartwheels if you decide to put something in one place rather than another. There are scores of Mac users who have been using OS X for five years with stuff located all over their drive, yet they have never had to run Disk Warrior and they have never suffered from directory problems. If they had, it would be a huge topic of discussion. Instead, there are threads where folks openly question whether Disk Warrior is even necessary anymore. e.g.: http://emperor.tidbits.com/webx?14@@.3c7926a4 No disrespect intended, but it sounds to me as if you are drawing conclusions that aren't warranted. Can you cite any authority for your "computer working harder/increased directory corruption" theory? Anything at all? This is the sort of thing that really strikes me as something that Apple, and several other sources, would have written something about if it were the case. It also strikes me that a "Newbies" list is the wrong place to be advocating concepts for which you have no authority to cite whatsoever, and which is contrary to common experience. If you want to broach and argue controversial theories about OS X, it might be best to save that for the X4U list, and not risk spreading FUD among newbies. ___________________________________________ Randy B. Singer Co-author of The Macintosh Bible (4th, 5th, and 6th editions) Macintosh OS X Routine Maintenance http://www.macattorney.com/ts.html ___________________________________________