On Apr 17, 2005, at 7:53 pm, ~flipper wrote: > > Stroller, you mentioned Gentoo 'not being for the faint of heart". Is > that due to lots of using 'ln' and configuring rc files and whatnot, > as in not very 'automated'? That doesn't put me off either, but, for > all i know, there might be another issue, or issues, that I'm unaware > of re; the gentoo (tricky) thing. You've pretty much put your finger right on it. With most other distros (for x86, anyway) you can put the CD in & get a GUI all the way through to the installed desktop, whereas Gentoo's install is entirely command-line orientated - you have to fdisk partitions for yourself, untar the base files, compile the kernel & install the boot-loader for yourself. For those that appreciate it there is something reassuringly old-fangled about installing Gentoo; it's like "this is how Unix is supposed to be". A GUI is optional. It's also worth upgrading Gentoo on a weekly-basis; Gentoo ensures that you'll never have to do a complete reinstall on a system, that you can always upgrade, but at the expense of frequent updates. If you leave it a few weeks the number of updates can be quite daunting. > I don't have X11 on the Mac now... Apple no longer distributes X11 for > Jag, Maybe X11 is on the Installers for jag, i'll check, but, if not, > then what? 1) I think I have a copy of X11 for Jag 2) Buy Tiger (I thought you were dumping Jag, anyway? Aren't you buying a new machine for MacOS which will have Tiger pre-installed?) > If I decide (very likely) to forego the Aqua/GUI and start out with a > clean Darwin install, I should look for a rooted x86 install, no? "x86" means "PC architecture" - Intel & AMD & the like. Your Mac laptop will be a PPC. > Or can I go with KDE (which actually has all the XML apps, not Gnome > as i mistakenly 'remembered'), right on top of Darwin? Theoretically, but I don't think there are actually many people using Darwin in that way. Does fink handle X11 on pure Darwin? What package manager do you propose using otherwise? > And last but not least, the 'distros'. Can i start with a clean drive, > or do i need some basic architecture as a foundation? A clean drive is fine for a Linux distro. > About 18 months ago a friend gave me an 8-CD set that was a Red hat > installer. Now, that must sound ridiculous. It looked it. I thought, > "what sort of unix needs 5+ GBs for an istall????". I started out as a > troubleshooter on mid-70s IBM big boxes, and 5GBs would have hld all > of IBM's worldwide stuff. (ok, maybe not, but still, my 667 back then > would have been the size of a Sears store, i think). Lots has changed, > hasn't it? Those CDs will include at least 1CD of source code (probably 2 or 3 in the case of an 8 CD set) & 1CD of commercial applications. The "core" first CD or two will include at least a couple of window-managers, X11, Open Office and perhaps a thousand or two command-line & GUI applications. You might, however, be pleased to hear that the Gentoo minimal CD is 38meg (get the 2CD set for precompiled X11 & wm, tho'). Stroller.