On May 3, 2005, at 2:43 PM, Zane H. Healy wrote: > Please pardon my frustration, maybe I'm being dense here, but what I'm > trying to do is get a realistic idea of how much the applications > think I'm > using. Do I simply bog the system down as much as I expect it to be > normally, do a "du -sk /var/vm", and then go out and buy that much > Physical > RAM, or should I be doing something else. I think you're being a wee bit dense, only in that you're worrying about system calls at a level below where the OS is expecting you to care about it. Sure, on Solaris you're expecting to know and deal with this. Here, only if you want to. I run my PowerBook with 1 Gb of RAM since that was the max when I got it, and I haven't yet felt the need to pick up bigger chips. Trust me, I'm a power user -- not uncommon for me to have 30 apps open simultaneously. When MenuMeters tells me I'm seriously thrashing, I log out and log back in. I'm already noting that Tiger will probably be much more efficient at this, since it seems to be releasing VM much better than Panther did. IOW, I don't agree with you that Macs are more RAM-hungry (although I don't have other Unix flavors as a reference). If your system is running slow, get more. Simple enough, no? Best, Jeff