Gretchen Hayman wrote: > > On Apr 27, 2005, at 04:38, Allan Hise wrote: > >> On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Timothy J. Luoma wrote: >> >>> honestly I use scp at the commandline, but I'm a bit of a freak. I have >>> this function defined >> >> >> Agreed. Thats the way to go. No passwords in the open, etc. And it comes >> with the OS. > > > Sorry to be a weenie here, but scp is most definitely _not_ an ftp > application. scp and ftp use different protocols (and ports); scp uses > ssh and ftp uses ftp. Just wanted to make sure that was clear to those > who might not know. You are right. 'scp' (secure copy) is a replacement for 'rcp' (remote copy), which is network aware version of the 'cp' (copy) command. 'scp' uses 'ssh' (secure shell) to copy files across file systems. FTP, in turn is a protocol designed for file transfers, and contains some features that facilitate this, such as directory scanning, transparent newline conversion (ASCII mode), and resume of failed transfers. You /could/ use 'sftp', which is the FTP protocol tunneled through an SSH connection, which provides the security of 'ssh' with the versatility of FTP. But I don't think 'sftp' comes in MacOS X's suite of Terminal.app utilities. dZ.