Robert Ameeti <Robert at Ameeti.net> wrote: >At 9:32 PM -0400, 5/16/05, Kevin Willis wrote: > >>Right now, I have used about 77 GB of a 120 GB drive. It changes >>from day to day. As I burn disks, I erase the burned files. I also >>record some TV shows over night. >> >>Defragging didn't help with the performance. I reckon I will try to >>burn the rest of the files, then erase the disk to see if that >>helps. I have Tiger installed on another 120 GB drive, but I don't >>really want to put that drive through what I am doing to the other >>drive. I also have a 40 GB drive that has my old Panther system on >>it. I might erase it and use it to hold some of the files. >> >>Thanks, >> >>Kevin > >My local Fry's electronics store has a Seagate 160 GB hard drive for >$54.99 after mail-in rebate. How can this not be a good answer to >the problem? Personally I'd rather have an extra drive for backup >and defrag than a $30 piece of software that MAY fix the problem. experienced sysadmins have an easier time understanding why defrag "utilities" are a bogus...a farce...snake-oil...hardly a solution. what miniscule effect defrag "utilities" may have won't last...fragmentation begins as soon as you restart. <http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=snake%20oil> ;) don