Read this piece too: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/05/23/why_apple_wont_embrace_intel/ dZ. On May 23, 2005, at 20:46, Donald Diswinka wrote: > I suggest before anyone gets their knickers to wet about Apple and > Intel please read the following articles. > > http://www.reed-electronics.com/electronicnews/article/CA602292.html > > and > > http://www.reed-electronics.com/electronicnews/article/CA603431.html > > Appears like normal ongoing dialogue for Intel licensing Firewire in > their future comm motherboard interfaces. > > Don > > > > > On 23-May-05, at 7:21 PM, Brett Conlon wrote: > >> It could be Apple's way of putting a firecracker up IBM's glute's to >> get >> their chip manufacturing kinks ironed out! ;-D >> >> Coj >> >> >> >> Randy B.Singer <randy at macattorney.com> >> >> Michael Winter said: >> >>> There are all kinds of reasons for Apple to be talking to Intel about >>> "chips". Many more plausible IMO than about primary CPUs for a new >>> breed of Mac. But that doesn't make headlines and create buzz. >> >> >> All true. >> >> But since Apple is in a qunadry about processors just now, the fact >> that >> they are chatting with the world's largest maker of PC processors >> sure is >> interesting. >> >> >> >> Randy B. Singer >> Co-Author of: The Macintosh Bible (4th, 5th and 6th editions) >> >> Routine OS X Maintenance and Generic Troubleshooting >> http://www.macattorney.com/ts.html >> > > _______________________________________________ > X4U mailing list > X4U at listserver.themacintoshguy.com > http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/x4u > > Listmom is trying to clean out his closets! Vintage Mac and random > stuff: > http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZmacguy1984 >