I am curious as to why there seem to be many X users that, excuse the expression, blindly leap into the next incarnation of OS X even if it does not appear to be a step forward? Such as Tiger. What exactly is it that Tiger is supposed to accomplish as far as moving forward with a fast, sleek, secure operating system? I have reviewed the "features" offered by Tiger, and I fail to see any significant improvement in performance. In fact, all I see is some "gussy-ing up" with knick-knacks that seem to only serve to bog down the OS and the user experience. What am I missing? My concern is that if we Mac users blindly jump on sub-par updates, that is all we will get. I think the Mac world would be better served, and that Apple's future would be better secured if we are a little more particular about what we accept as upgrades to our Mac operating systems. I liked Jaguar, and I like Panther better than Jaguar. Does any Tiger user like it better than they liked Panther? Why? This is not intended as a rant, rather, it is put forward as concerned discussion. Please address it as such. Thanks. Regards, Wayne Clodfelter wayne at troutnc.com