On Oct 19, 2005, at 10:23 pm, Zane H. Healy wrote: >> >> I thought it was overly apparent, even blatant, as the page states >> right at >> the top: "Designed for Professional Photographers" > > OK, let me put it this way, why would I want "Aperture" instead of > "Adobe Photoshop CS2"? I don't know why _you_ might want Aperture instead of Photoshop, but many may choose it for its library management - the ability to import directly from the camera, browse thumbnail libraries & to store original images alongside the edited work. Personally, I find Photoshop's toolbars obscure - I wanted to change the colour temperature of a photo the other day and it took me several times as long to do so in Photoshop as it did in iPhoto, however I persevered because I wanted the ability of Photoshop / ImageReady to "export to the web" at a given resolution with 4 quality previews showing filesize. There's no way to say whether Aperture's editing facilities will be as advanced as Photoshop's, but maybe they don't need to be. It seems to me that Photoshop is not aimed just at professional photographers, but instead does everything for everybody - Aperture's is a narrower target audience, I think. Photoshop offers facilities to use colour fills & paint coloured squares & ellipses, but many people don't need that. If you watch the "profiles" video on the Aperture pages Heinz Kluetmeier says why he'll choose Aperture. It seems to me that many wedding photographers will enjoy the facilities to export to Apple's glossy hard-copy photoalbums, and others will like being able to print contact sheets (which I don't believe Photoshop handles). Stroller.