On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 02:20:49AM CDT, Ronald Steinke <ronsteinke at mac.com> wrote: : : On 22 June, 2006, at 3:02:28, Jens Selvig wrote: : : >If you don't like the DRM restrictions don't purchase the music. If : >enough customers choose to with hold their purchase of DRM'd music, : >the sellers will quickly alter their practice of locking up their : >music. : : Sorry, but I simply do not agree with this portion of your post. : [...] : : As long as the buying public will accept conditions and restrictions : and continue to buy the products, the producers will continue to : force their desires and conditions on all of us. Then, it becomes a : requirement for those who do not like those actions to rebel against : the conditions by peaceful and lawful means. : : As long as the law does not specifically prohibit an action, it can : be argued that the action is legal even if morally or ethically : wrong. Big businesses use this as an excuse all the time, some : politicians do too. Shouldn't we have the right to use the same type : of tactics? The problem is that big business lobbies the government far more effectively than average consumers. Of course the only true way to kill DRM is to launch a holy crusade against the source. : If the law specifically prohibits an action that we consider it to be : immoral or unethical in its enforcement, then we should have the : right to work to repeal that law. Most people have been scared into following the law instead of doing the right thing. -- Eugene http://www.coxar.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/