>From: Frank Isackson <fisackson at earthlink.net> >Subject: Re: [X4U] CD : Digital Audio cd same as CD for data? >To: "A place to discuss Mac OS X for the casual user." > <x4u at listserver.themacintoshguy.com> >Message-ID: <954A0C2F-D501-4007-BE29-34E1230941A3 at earthlink.net> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed > >The quality standards for data media are higher than those for music. >If a microsecond of music were missing your ear wouldn't notice; a >microsecond of data could a catastrophic loss. Similar logic is at >work in the hard disks in iPODs. They are not as fault-free in >recording music as their brethren produced for data storage. Disc segment data includes full CRC data checking, so unless they designed and manufactured special non-standard controller cards to build into the drive, that isn't the case. They may have a larger number of bad blocks, but bad block relocation has been normal since not all that long after disc drives were invented. Bad blocks don't cause incorrect data. A block going bad on you can cause data loss. Like most digital things, it's there, perfect, or it's not there at all. CD-Rs, being rather wooly at the pit level, can be an exception. David -- David Ledger - Freelance Unix Sysadmin in the UK. Chair of HPUX SysAdmin SIG of hpUG technical user group (www.hpug.org.uk) david.ledger at ivdcs.co.uk www.ivdcs.co.uk