Christopher J Collins wrote: Well spoken, sir. More power to you... keith whaley -- > Slightly. But then I realise he "appears" to be just another smug, self > opinionated mac user and I brush it off. > > In this world, there are people who have to use Windows. There are > people who have to use Macs. There are people who have to use various > iterations of *nix, including Linux, Unix and (showing my age now) Xenix. > > We use what we have to use to get the job done that we need to do. > > I have an MBP17 and a HP nx9420. Apart from the fingerprint sensor and > the media card reader on the HP, they are the exact same hardware. > > Fundamentalism, (the belief that my choice is right and everyone else is > wrong) is just plain stupid no matter where it occurs. Whether that be > in the choice of a computer, a political party, a religion, anywhere. > > Some people get to choose what they use to do their work. Consider > yourself lucky. The majority of Windows users don't get a choice. Their > employer dictates what they use at work, and that generally rubs off > into the home as well. > > I had to go and see my cardiologist yesterday to check that everything > was working OK after the operation, and I was very surprised to find > that the office he shares uses iMacs and not Windows boxes. And yet all > the people there complain about the Macs, because they use Windows at > home and elsewhere and know how to use it. The Macs were put in because > the owner of the practice likes Macs and was prepared to accept what > appears to be a second rate practice management system because of his > bias towards Macs. > > Does that make him right or wrong? Doesn't matter either way, it was the > decision he made as the owner. > > One of the major advantages to a Mac is that I can run multiple > operating systems on it. I can run Mac OS X. I can run Windows XP. I can > run Windows Vista. I can run any version of Windows. I can run almost > any version of Linux. And I know that it will work well, because of the > hardware it is running on. Like the HP, the MBP is built on solid, high > quality hardware. And it works well. > > My HP has very rarely ever crashed in it's lifetime. And as a > consultant, I abuse the heck out of it. I install stuff I shouldn't. I > get attacked by huge numbers of viruses and malware simly because it is > used as a storage centre for clients while their machines are being > worked on. And it keeps chugging along. > > The company I consult for puts computer networks into dental practices > and supports them. It is very rare for us to ever have a problem that > cannot be solved simply by a reboot. That is the simplest way I know to > fix operator error. The servers almost never have problems because we > keep the users away from them. > > Does that make the Windows boxes that we put into the practices less > good than a Mac? Nope. The software we support runs on windows so we > deal with it. The previous software we supported ran on Xenix/Unix so we > supported it. The other software run on Sun workstations so we supported > it. and if the writer of the software decides to go to Macs, we will > support that as well. > > We do what we have to do and learn what we have to learn to support our > clients to help them achieve what they want to achieve. > > If a Mac does what you want, then by all means buy one. But don't > denigrate Windows users because that is their choice. > > my AU$0.02 worth....... > > cjc >