On Dec 17, 2008, at 5:39 PM, Aron S. Spencer wrote: > Not sure what OS 9 has to do with QC, but here's a bit about how > Apple compares to the rest: > > <http://www.macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/ > apple_mac_tops_comprehensive_computer_reliability_report_again/> > When you take basic functionality of an OS and essentially tell the users to go scratch people (including myself) get upset. Quality control is part of *COMPATIBILITY* AT least one major manufacturer takes such items seriously. From design to implementation it is part of the QC process. Compatibility between releases of OS (and or hardware) is really important because like I said 100's of millions of dollars of investment (company assets are involved) if those assets no longer work they cannot be on the books as assets. 100's of millions is no small bowl of nuts it is a piece of the pie and every CEO looks at all the important financial numbers. 100's of millions is NOT chump change to any corporate entity. Ed