On Oct 7, 2008, at 10:20 PM, Gene Steinberg wrote: > > > I'm wondering here why nobody has responded to my suggestion that the > outgoing port number be changed? That is almost always the answer in > situations like this. > > Either 587 or 465 works, depending on the situation. > > Peace, > Gene > > Gene: I have done so (usually found the first time MAIL is tried. It is blocked (by COMCAST). I have no issue with it, just that COMCAST doesn't discuss the issue a whole lot. I still get complaints about SPAM even though I use the "standard" COMCAST PORT. Ed