On Aug 10, 2010, at 12:42 PM, H F wrote: > > It wasn't the content that was inappropriate, it was the fact that > the pictures (100) were included in the post. I've seen many sigs > that included URL's but seldom have I had a sig that opened > automatically (and strangely at the top of the message). Images are > generally not considered appropriate in forums/lists. Must be a "feature" of whatever mail program/system you are using. The rest of us (or at least most of us?) just saw a link that had to be clicked. The web page was not embedded in the message like you're describing. It would be interesting to know how/why that happened. -Mike