<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: [X4U] Re: Hijacking threads</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<FONT FACE="Verdana"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12.0px'>Because it is, by definition, “wrong” when it doesn’t conform to the mechanism built into the tool that they are using, especially when the tool then fails to work as intended, whether or not to their own detriment.<BR>
<BR>
As Wendy said, if you change the subject, be aware that people who use threads (who may be useful resources) won’t see your message.<BR>
<BR>
And, of course, there’s nothing “wrong” with deciding to do it your way (i.e., “wrong” :-), but info on why that might not work as well as it could should be considered. <BR>
<BR>
And there’s nothing “wrong” with explaining it by calling it “wrong.” :-)<BR>
<BR>
Regards, Jim<BR>
=========<BR>
<BR>
on 1/21/07 1:54 PM, nk at netkat@comcast.net wrote:<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT><BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE="Andale Mono"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:14.0px'><TT>why does what some folks do have to be defined as "wrong?"<BR>
why do those folks need to be straightened out?<BR>
<BR>
nk<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
On Jan 21, 2007, at 9:41 AM, Wendy S. Austin wrote:<BR>
<BR>
>> On 21 Jan 2007, at 18:09, Linda wrote:<BR>
>> (And... STILL no one has explained to the people whose behavior <BR>
>> sparked the<BR>
>> thread, WHY what they are doing is considered wrong by some folks...)<BR>
<BR>
_______________________________________________<BR>
X4U mailing list<BR>
X4U@listserver.themacintoshguy.com<BR>
<a href="http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/x4u">http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/x4u</a><BR>
<BR>
Listmom is trying to clean out his closets! Vintage Mac and random stuff:<BR>
<a href="http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZmacguy1984">http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZmacguy1984</a><BR>
</TT></SPAN></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE="Andale Mono"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:14.0px'><TT><BR>
</TT></SPAN></FONT>
</BODY>
</HTML>