> From: Mike Urseth <mike at signhelpers.com> > > Of course I'm plugging along in the Old World of 9.2. Getting into > OSX native versions of Quark, Illustrator, etc. will be a little > pricey. > Which is why Classic is so nice. I use "old" versions of Quark, Illustrator, Photoshop and so on sometimes still, and all of them work perfectly in Classic. > I realize that I can run Classic (although I must admit to being more > than a little underwhelmed by what I've seen of that process. This I don't understand at all. What's different about Classic as opposed to OS 9? I have Classic set to start up automatically when the machine is restarted (which happens about once a week, tops). Classic starting up of course adds time to the startup routine (about a minute), but I'm out of the room when this happens anyway so I don't care. Once active, Classic performs seamlessly with OS X, and "sleeps" if not in use so I never have to restart it. Between that and not having to shut down my computer so often (maybe once or twice a month), OS X has made me remarkably more productive than I ever was in OS 9. _Chas_ Claiming that the Macintosh is inferior to Windows because most people use Windows is like saying that all other restaurants are inferior to McDonald's.