"JAS" wrote: >How silent will a Cube be with a processor upgrade (Powerlogix Dual 800 or >similar) and possibly a graphics card upgrade also. Will it be in the region >of iMac Globe? With the caveats that I work most of the time in a very noisy (white noise, so it's not distracting) room (so loud a wind tunnel G4 isn't particularly audible), and only some of the time in other, quieter rooms with iMac G4's and Cubes, I find the iMacs quieter than a Cube with a 1 GHz PL upgrade. That said, both are nearly inaudible, but the fan in the PL kit does have a faint but noticeable, high-pitched whine. > >And also a q about OSX speed, I read this conclusion on upgradeing to >Powerlogix 1GHz: > >"In practice, we can notice acceleration by 2 of G4 after installation of >the new processor. I do not find that the Finder is as reactive as under Mac >OS 9 with the old 450 MHz processor but it is more reactive than before." This appears to be completely subjective. The OS X finder has so many more things to do, under a true multitasking system, that is seems silly to compare this year's apples with last year's dried-up pippins. For what it's worth, if you have one of the latest, dual 1+ GHz G4 desktops (the loud ones), the Finder is significantly faster than the OS 9 Finder was on, say, a 450 Sawtooth. The 1 GHz-upgraded Cube is somewhere in between. Pretty meaningless, though --- I was happy with a B&W G3 350 at home running OS X until I started using a wind tunnel G4 at work. I suspect anyone who's new to OS X will be quite happy with a 1 GHZ Cube. (The possible exception, of course, is if you play graphics-intensive games; I don't have much experience there.) >Is X so demanding that even a 1GHz system will feel slow compared to >450MHz/G4 running OS9? Not to me, anyway. FWIW, Joe Gurman -- "I love deadlines. I love the whooshing sound they make as they go by." - Douglas Adams, 1952 - 2001 Joseph B. Gurman, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Solar Physics Branch, Greenbelt MD 20771 USA