I'm sure you can scavange the reject bins to find prices that scale cheaper than .99/song. Now, do you really think that Apple should base the prices of their music download service on the price per track that you found for a Yoko Ono maxi single? What is that, 10 versions of the same song? Did you get a free bowl of soup with that too? Look, most albumns that people might actually WANT cost about $18. On Apple's service that cost is $10- a savings of $8. And if there is just one or two songs you like, the cost is $2- a savings of $16. Yes, you don't get the little booklet. Oh well. Yoko Ono? 'nuff said. -Ray on 4/28/03 2:01 PM, Thubten Kunga wrote: > I paid $6 for Yoko > Ono's TEN track Maxi-Single of "Walking On Thin Ice" which is 72.5 > minutes long yesterday ? $4 less expensive. I paid $18 for 21 tracks > and 141.5 minutes of Nick Warren's Global Underground Reykjavik 024 two > CD box yesterday ? $3 less expensive. I have a big booklet that came > with it, I have three CDs that I can rip anyway I like as often as I > like, and it was $7 less expensive. The Apple Music service pricing > doesn't make any sense. The downloaded track must cost significantly > less than the cost of buying CDs before this model will work. I think > 49Ę a track is a more realistic success target price.