John Allan wrote: > > RFC 1855 > > Brief summary ... > > If you are replying to a post on *ANY* digest, please don=B9t just hit the > reply button on your emailer and copy *ALL* of the email you have received. > > Some people follow email lists in Digest Form of 10 or 20 emails. > > Filling up a digest with 12" of copied and pasted garbage other have > alread= y read is a pain in the ass and on a par of elegancy with > chewing gum with your mouth open. > > Folk receiving Digest cannot just delete your message, they have to > scroll through it to try and find where the next message starts and > will curse tha= t all your children with have small penises. Even > your daughters. > > Learn how to use your emailer, you do not *HAVE* to send everything. > It is = a big waste of bandwidth. > > I wish this was stamped on the front of every computer sold. > > John > > Just an FYI, since we're on the topic of digests. I try and receive all my list email via digest because I've got an un-digester utility that turns them back into individual emails that I can then reply to on an individual basis. Of course, I'm still using a text based email reader so I have the luxury to pipe my inbox messages to an external perl command that parses the digest, and relaunches a sub-process email reader to read those extracted messages. Once done with the digest, I just quite that sub-process email reader session and I'm back in my original email session. See....there ARE still advantages to the old text methods 8^). Email reader - elm2.4ME+ Digester - burst (digest conforming to RFC 1153, 934, or 1521) by By Alan Schwartz (c) 1996 8^) -- J.C. Webber III Technical Lead, Unix System Administrator, Apple Computers jcw at apple.com (work) jcw at kingoblio.com (home) www.kingoblio.com