There is no "pissing contest" going on here. Seth is proposing this flashed ROM PC GeForce 3 that is priced about the same as an Apple OEM GeForce 3 (>$200) that IS TwinView as if it might be a better deal. One thing that might make that true is if it is also TwinView. So far the evidence is that it may not be. If not, this new card option may not be nearly as attractive as if it is. This is not meant to be an attack on Seth for his discovery. I and others on the list are grateful to Seth for the find. And the discussion is about the details of this new choice. That's what this list is for, sharing different points of view and posing questions that help us all understand more about what's going on out there. I am trying to find out the facts of the matter on behalf of those list members who would like to know. How that is perceived as a "pissing contest" is beyond my ability to comprehend. I'm sure there are a number of list members who would also like to know the answer to that question. Just because you and Hal are not interested doesn't mean other list members aren't. You have quite the gaul to think that you speak for all list members. I am certain you don't, just as I am certain that I don't either. k On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at 09:47 PM, Todd Masco wrote: >> Seth is your card TwinView or not? > > Enough! Many of us don't give a rat's patootie whether a card is > "TwinView" or not, so please spare us the pissing contest!