Finally! That was a lot of posts! Congrats on the perseverance. k On Monday, January 13, 2003, at 04:17 AM, Richard Clark wrote: > glad you got it installed had a gut feeling it was the ram. > On Monday, Jan 13, 2003, at 11:13 Europe/Rome, Riba wrote: > >>> Thank you one and all - bad RAM was the culprit! I took out my 512 >>> and 256 >>> "chips" and Jag installed like a dream. I know several listers >>> thought that >>> was the problem, and I hope they will now take a virtual bow. >> >> Heh, I knew it! :) >> >>> So - how do I figure out which one (both?) was bad? They were >>> recognized by >>> the system profiler and given a clean bill of health by Tech tool >>> pro. Any >>> advice would be most welcome. >> >> I can't see any other solution but to test them one at a time. Also, >> check what is written on them, probably one of them has different >> specs. Can't really tell what exactly to look for though :( >> >>> Also - am I dreaming or does iTunes sound better in Jag than in OS9? >>> (same >>> mp3's) >> >> Don't know, it's been a while since I've run OS9...but possibly they >> do :) >> Congratulations on successful install! :)