Bill > On Saturday, January 18, 2003, at 01:30 PM, Sensei (Eliezer Navarsky) > wrote: > >> And why would you assume such a thing?!... > > That most of the list is against piracy? It seems they are. No one > jumped in saying they weren't. No, why would you assume that I would be using it for piracy?!... > >> For example, It is still legal to move music (that I legally own) from >> my home computer to my office computer... > > Sure is. Thank you. > >> For an additional example, it is still legal to share original >> music... > > Yep, on the original media. Original music in this case referred to music that was original (i.e. not commercial). For example, your teenage son's rock band's own stuff... > >> The fact that certain software/hardware allows IP piracy does NOT mean >> that it is used exclusively for that purpose... Your CD writer can be >> used to produce bootleg copies of software and music CD's - does that >> mean you use it for that?!... > > Well, Apple claims iCommune was produced illegally so your fight is > with Apple, not me. It can be used with iTunes for piracy as you point > out just like Napster. Apple just doesn't want (and rightly so) a Napster like debacle around any of its products. Their lawyers went over the eula with a fine comb (next you'll be telling us that you actually read those things) and found a technical breach which was enough to be able to scare the guy off. Look, I'll let you in a little secret - I don't give a rat's ass about what Apple claims. It is a nifty extension that I personally use for perfectly legal purposes. Back to you. You started out by wrongly accusing me of piracy. When I pointed out that iCommune can be used for legal purposes you came back with some more "humorous" repartees. You could have graciously I offered your apologies. You could have just let it be. I guess you are one of those people who must have the last word... Sensei.