On Saturday, January 18, 2003, at 10:02 PM, Sensei (Eliezer Navarsky) wrote: > No, why would you assume that I would be using it for piracy?!... I didn't. I made a statement about my impression of the general ethics of the list and denied speaking for the list. > >> >>> The fact that certain software/hardware allows IP piracy does NOT >>> mean >>> that it is used exclusively for that purpose... Your CD writer can be >>> used to produce bootleg copies of software and music CD's - does that >>> mean you use it for that?!... >> >> Well, Apple claims iCommune was produced illegally so your fight is >> with Apple, not me. It can be used with iTunes for piracy as you point >> out just like Napster. > > Apple just doesn't want (and rightly so) a Napster like debacle around > any of its products. This repeats my second point. > Look, I'll let you in a little secret - I don't give a rat's ass about > what Apple claims. Not a secret, it's obvious. > It is a nifty extension that I personally use for perfectly legal > purposes. That's your choice. > Back to you. You started out by wrongly accusing me of piracy. Nope. See the first point above. > When I pointed out that iCommune can be used for legal purposes you > came back with some more "humorous" repartees. No, I agreed with you. > You could have graciously I offered your apologies. You could have > just let it be. I guess you are one of those people who must have the > last word... Huh? There's an old saying about a pot and a kettle.... Well, my last word is if I ever get on my high horse again on this list, someone please shoot me.