Apple likes to confuse the market by claiming larger physical size = higher resolution when it doesn't. I wish they would offer a 16" UXGA 1600 x 1200 PowerBook screen. But they won't because they don't like to follow any successful tactic from the PC world. LAME. k On Wednesday, January 29, 2003, at 11:57 PM, Joakim Skog wrote: >> I noticed too. I think getting the 23" 1920 x 1200 for $2K to go major > > While we're talking about monitor and resolutions; the 17" PowerBook's > display is 1440 * 900. Yesterday I saw a 15" Hewlett-Packard doing > 1400*1050. How come we can't get higher resolutions in the PB? > > /Joakim