> Certain DSL/cable router vendors will provide decent Mac support > (e.g. Mac executables for firmware updates), and some won't. > Virtually all current products are manageable (even for firmware > updates) via a Web interface, so the OS question is nearly moot. For > instance, Asant=E9's FR3004 series uses the same circuitry as slightly > less expensive Linksys and other products, but has clearly better QA > and, in the year plus that I've had one, no problems working with a > Motorola SURFboard cable modem and various flavors of OS 9 and OS X. > The simple fact is that, with an inexpensive cable/DSL router, you > don't have to care about what's upstream (cable, DSL flavo[u]r, &c.). > > Joe Gurman Joe et al, I take your point that routers don't need elaborate manuals and OS software. That is now that I know how they work. When it first came out of the box I had no idea how it worked, and was rather dazed and confused. The manufacturer (D-Link) provided an idiot's guide for Windows users. (draw whatever mac-iste conclusions you want) I would have appreciated at least some basic information given that it had lots of smiley "mac-compatible" logos outside. Thanks all for comments. sorry if this was a bit off-list. chris