Thanks everyone for the reply's, I'm surprised the GF2 gives out a similar temp to the Rage 128, seems i may as well stick with my GF2. ~a On Wednesday, May 7, 2003, at 05:48 pm, Bill Fox wrote: > I still use the stock Rage 128 Pro on a Cube 450 used as a network > server (OSX Server 10.2.5). I've measured the heat flowing out of the > back vent and there is virtually no difference between the Rage and > GF2MX. That said, in my experience the Rage 128 Pro is better (faster) > for most graphics other than for games that use the GF2MX's 32 MB > VRAM. Quartz Extreme, in general, is not what it is cracked up to be. > > I use a GF3 in my production 1.2 GHz Cube and the heat is about 10% > greater at maximum than that of the Rage 128 Pro or GF2MX in the > otherwise stock 450 Cube.